Director of Operations Sheryl Sandberg admitted that Facebook was wrong to delete a post showing a specific image of a naked girl who survived the Napalm attack during the Vietnam War, as Reuters reported. In a letter to Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg, approval was received by Reuters on Monday
Last week, Facebook repeated Pulitzer’s award-winning photo, “The Terror of War”, on the grounds that it violated the bond of nudity.
Certainly the company’s upsurge has come from a global storm. The controversy began when Norway writer Tom Egland published the photograph as one of seven photographs related to the war, along with a blog on war history. The photo shows 9-year-old Ban Kim Phook naked, as her clothes burn off her body – who is running away with other children.
The editor of Norway’s largest daily Aftenposten wrote an open letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg criticizing the handling of the Facebook issue. A Facebook office in Hamburg sent a posted email asking them to remove the photo from their page. Newspaper editor Aspen Egil Hansen responded, before Facebook removed the image and associated articles from the social media page.
Hanson criticized the measure in his letter, as he told Zuckerberg that Facebook, which he sees as a powerful media platform, was involved in censorship.
“I think you’re misusing your strength and having difficulty believing that you’ve thought about it,” Hanson wrote.
Support for the original post soon became so widespread that Solberg republished the image on his page, which Facebook also removed.
Solberg wrote in a post on Facebook, “Facebook does this by removing images of this nature, as might be intended, to edit our shared history. I hope Facebook takes advantage of this opportunity in its editorial policy And will take responsibility for a larger company. ” .
Before Facebook went its way, it advocated freedom of expression, allowing journalists and other critics to ignore the historical context of the image and rely too heavily on its computerized algorithms.
Facebook spokesman Andrea Saul noted that the photograph of the naked child usually violates the standards of the Facebook community and in some countries it can be classified as pornography. However, after the uproar, the company realized that the specific image in question had great historical significance.
image to Facebook because We realized that it had been removed, ”Saul said. TechNewsWorld.
He said that Facebook will adjust its review mechanism to allow sharing of photos in the future.
Saul said the company would engage with publishers and other members of the global Facebook community to improve its policies to promote freedom of expression.
The dispute follows a series of steps taken by Facebook and other social media companies to monitor the growing problems of online harassment, hate speech and social media use in terrorist activities. Facebook and other social media platforms have made changes to their service agreements and algorithms to ascertain what many see as abusive online behavior.
Facebook was criticized in May after accusing the company’s report of being biased in issues against the Conservatives. In response, she made several changes to the way the formatting of the material was attempted in an attempt to remove human bias from the image.
Facebook may have gone too far to rely on its technology to make logical decisions about the content on its pages, while censoring legitimate images and speech to create unintended consequences.
“I think this is further evidence that Facebook played an important role in the publication,” said Rick Edmonds, media business analyst at the Poynter Institute for Media Studies.
He told TechNewsWorld: “They are auditing the standards, whether the algorithm or not.” Affected Norway journalists say, “Human editors make big mistakes, but this measure is very illogical.”
Fluxbox Window Manager is a barely lightweight window manager. It comes in advance with the most common tasks. This makes Slacks much less complicated than using the full K desktop available in earlier and earlier Slax 8 versions.
The integration of Fluxbox into the new slacks is a shortcut that I hope Matíjíček did not take. Granted, Fluxbox is one of the best lightweight window managers in Linux, but it bans the Super Lightness user interface.